<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why can&#8217;t there be compromise in the gun control debate?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pointlessbanter.net/2009/04/13/why-cant-there-be-compromise-in-the-gun-control-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pointlessbanter.net/2009/04/13/why-cant-there-be-compromise-in-the-gun-control-debate/</link>
	<description>Once You Read It You Can't Unread It</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 01:50:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://pointlessbanter.net/2009/04/13/why-cant-there-be-compromise-in-the-gun-control-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-37197</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 07:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pointlessbanter.net/?p=8532#comment-37197</guid>
		<description>thanks don thats  of the what the rest of the friggin world needs to understand. morebans.org... read the list of guns damn anti-gun activist want to outlaw. hundreds and hundreds of guns... and a vast majority of them are defiantly not assault, automatic, or even semi-automatic weapons.they are bolt action rifles. 

just a few things that will make a gun illegal if this bill passes

pistols:
ammo capacity over7 rounds internal or external
caliber larger than .25 auto

rifles:
telescoping or collapsing stock
pistol grip
semi auto 
ammo capacity over 3 rounds
.30 calibers and larger=gone

shot gun:
ammo capacity over 6 rnds
pistol grip
telescoping stock(which is a huge hit for a good turkey gun)

anyway the few guns we will be left with to defend ourselves ammount to a handful of pistols that wouldnt fully penetrate an apple and only a few bolt action rifles with a mag cap of 3 rounds. most have a capp of 4-6, and the most that are 3 are magnum cartridges that push bullets at least .30 cal.


so to defend our selves against an illegal semi-auto or fully auto assault rifle or pistol us upstanding law abiding citizens are left with moot.

its like bringing a prius to a monster truck rally.

i personally dont give a damn what you care to do with your gun rights, just dont force your decisions on me.

gun crimes are the fault of delinquents that acquire and use firearms illegally. gun accidents are the result of irresponsible use. neither are the fault of manufactures. 
Is a car accident the fault of the driver or the manufacturer? 

there should be no debate. all guns should be left open to all (law abiding) citizens because even if you out law all guns there is still a black market, which by the way crimiminals tend to use so criminals will always have guns even if we dont.

the second amendment guarantees these rights to me, and the first guarantees me the right to post it.... or at least they did when the constitution meant anything. that being said feel free to respectfully agree or disagree with what i say and i will grant you the same courtesy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks don thats  of the what the rest of the friggin world needs to understand. morebans.org&#8230; read the list of guns damn anti-gun activist want to outlaw. hundreds and hundreds of guns&#8230; and a vast majority of them are defiantly not assault, automatic, or even semi-automatic weapons.they are bolt action rifles. </p>
<p>just a few things that will make a gun illegal if this bill passes</p>
<p>pistols:<br />
ammo capacity over7 rounds internal or external<br />
caliber larger than .25 auto</p>
<p>rifles:<br />
telescoping or collapsing stock<br />
pistol grip<br />
semi auto<br />
ammo capacity over 3 rounds<br />
.30 calibers and larger=gone</p>
<p>shot gun:<br />
ammo capacity over 6 rnds<br />
pistol grip<br />
telescoping stock(which is a huge hit for a good turkey gun)</p>
<p>anyway the few guns we will be left with to defend ourselves ammount to a handful of pistols that wouldnt fully penetrate an apple and only a few bolt action rifles with a mag cap of 3 rounds. most have a capp of 4-6, and the most that are 3 are magnum cartridges that push bullets at least .30 cal.</p>
<p>so to defend our selves against an illegal semi-auto or fully auto assault rifle or pistol us upstanding law abiding citizens are left with moot.</p>
<p>its like bringing a prius to a monster truck rally.</p>
<p>i personally dont give a damn what you care to do with your gun rights, just dont force your decisions on me.</p>
<p>gun crimes are the fault of delinquents that acquire and use firearms illegally. gun accidents are the result of irresponsible use. neither are the fault of manufactures.<br />
Is a car accident the fault of the driver or the manufacturer? </p>
<p>there should be no debate. all guns should be left open to all (law abiding) citizens because even if you out law all guns there is still a black market, which by the way crimiminals tend to use so criminals will always have guns even if we dont.</p>
<p>the second amendment guarantees these rights to me, and the first guarantees me the right to post it&#8230;. or at least they did when the constitution meant anything. that being said feel free to respectfully agree or disagree with what i say and i will grant you the same courtesy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://pointlessbanter.net/2009/04/13/why-cant-there-be-compromise-in-the-gun-control-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-37162</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 02:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pointlessbanter.net/?p=8532#comment-37162</guid>
		<description>Bobby, isn&#039;t there already a &quot;compromise?&quot;

Automatic rifles, machine guns, silencers, short barrel shotguns/rifles are already essentially illegal.

Anybody convicted of a felony cant buy/own a gun.

Anybody with a mental disease cant buy/own a gun

Anybody with any sort of domestic violence history cant buy/own a gun.

Anybody dishonorably discharged from the military cant buy/own a gun.

Anybody buying a gun from any dealer (including those at gun shows) must go through a FBI background test.
 
I don&#039;t see why rifles like the AR15 are singled out besides the fact they look scary. Any AR15 you can legally buy is functionally identical to any other non-scary looking semi auto rifle. 
Statistically, people who jump through all the legal hoops currently in place to legally obtain a firearm aren’t the people committing the crimes. Law abiding people tend to follow the law. Criminals tend to ignore it. What good will creating more laws do besides piss off people who are already following the rules?

On the Trannie issue, that seems blog worthy in its own right. There are a lot of different factors in play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bobby, isn&#8217;t there already a &#8220;compromise?&#8221;</p>
<p>Automatic rifles, machine guns, silencers, short barrel shotguns/rifles are already essentially illegal.</p>
<p>Anybody convicted of a felony cant buy/own a gun.</p>
<p>Anybody with a mental disease cant buy/own a gun</p>
<p>Anybody with any sort of domestic violence history cant buy/own a gun.</p>
<p>Anybody dishonorably discharged from the military cant buy/own a gun.</p>
<p>Anybody buying a gun from any dealer (including those at gun shows) must go through a FBI background test.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see why rifles like the AR15 are singled out besides the fact they look scary. Any AR15 you can legally buy is functionally identical to any other non-scary looking semi auto rifle.<br />
Statistically, people who jump through all the legal hoops currently in place to legally obtain a firearm aren’t the people committing the crimes. Law abiding people tend to follow the law. Criminals tend to ignore it. What good will creating more laws do besides piss off people who are already following the rules?</p>
<p>On the Trannie issue, that seems blog worthy in its own right. There are a lot of different factors in play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: country girl</title>
		<link>http://pointlessbanter.net/2009/04/13/why-cant-there-be-compromise-in-the-gun-control-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-37137</link>
		<dc:creator>country girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 20:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pointlessbanter.net/?p=8532#comment-37137</guid>
		<description>I want a fighter jet in my backyard.  That would be flippin&#039; cool. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want a fighter jet in my backyard.  That would be flippin&#8217; cool. <img src='http://pointlessbanter.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darryl</title>
		<link>http://pointlessbanter.net/2009/04/13/why-cant-there-be-compromise-in-the-gun-control-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-37086</link>
		<dc:creator>Darryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pointlessbanter.net/?p=8532#comment-37086</guid>
		<description>Ah yes, the ole &quot;friend&quot; question.   hehe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes, the ole &#8220;friend&#8221; question.   hehe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://pointlessbanter.net/2009/04/13/why-cant-there-be-compromise-in-the-gun-control-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-37056</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pointlessbanter.net/?p=8532#comment-37056</guid>
		<description>I agree that people owning assault weapons is a little nutty. I personally own a Colt 1911 .45 pistol, but that&#039;s it. I figure if I can&#039;t solve the problem with 7 .45 slugs, then I&#039;m in alot more trouble than I should be. 

And to be honest, the AR15 is a peashooter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that people owning assault weapons is a little nutty. I personally own a Colt 1911 .45 pistol, but that&#8217;s it. I figure if I can&#8217;t solve the problem with 7 .45 slugs, then I&#8217;m in alot more trouble than I should be. </p>
<p>And to be honest, the AR15 is a peashooter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby Finstock</title>
		<link>http://pointlessbanter.net/2009/04/13/why-cant-there-be-compromise-in-the-gun-control-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-37055</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby Finstock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 10:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pointlessbanter.net/?p=8532#comment-37055</guid>
		<description>That kid is wise beyond his years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That kid is wise beyond his years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby Finstock</title>
		<link>http://pointlessbanter.net/2009/04/13/why-cant-there-be-compromise-in-the-gun-control-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-37054</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby Finstock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 10:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pointlessbanter.net/?p=8532#comment-37054</guid>
		<description>Yeah but you are literate. I trust you to own a weapon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah but you are literate. I trust you to own a weapon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby Finstock</title>
		<link>http://pointlessbanter.net/2009/04/13/why-cant-there-be-compromise-in-the-gun-control-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-37053</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby Finstock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 10:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pointlessbanter.net/?p=8532#comment-37053</guid>
		<description>What if you were drunk... I am not asking for me but a friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if you were drunk&#8230; I am not asking for me but a friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://pointlessbanter.net/2009/04/13/why-cant-there-be-compromise-in-the-gun-control-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-37052</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 04:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pointlessbanter.net/?p=8532#comment-37052</guid>
		<description>Is making out cheating? Depends on how drunk you are and who the girl was. If there was history, yes. If she was totally random and it led nowhere, then no. Although you may want to factor in how psycho your current girl/boyfriend is, because that may change things a bit.

And when it comes to trannies, a mouth on your penis is a mouth on your penis. As my best friend&#039;s wise little brother once said, &quot;It&#039;s only gay if the balls touch.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is making out cheating? Depends on how drunk you are and who the girl was. If there was history, yes. If she was totally random and it led nowhere, then no. Although you may want to factor in how psycho your current girl/boyfriend is, because that may change things a bit.</p>
<p>And when it comes to trannies, a mouth on your penis is a mouth on your penis. As my best friend&#8217;s wise little brother once said, &#8220;It&#8217;s only gay if the balls touch.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: natalie</title>
		<link>http://pointlessbanter.net/2009/04/13/why-cant-there-be-compromise-in-the-gun-control-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-37050</link>
		<dc:creator>natalie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 04:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pointlessbanter.net/?p=8532#comment-37050</guid>
		<description>Why do you need it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you need it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

