Comments on: My theory on Dakota Fanning http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/ Once You Read It You Can't Unread It Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:01:16 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Carolyn http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/#comment-25653 Carolyn Fri, 12 Sep 2008 19:54:27 +0000 http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/#comment-25653 *snort* Are you seriously offended or am I missing a joke? *snort*
Are you seriously offended or am I missing a joke?

]]> By: Sarah http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/#comment-25510 Sarah Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:25:07 +0000 http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/#comment-25510 I would honestly like to say this CHILD is far from a robot. Hollywood just wished they created her. Before she was an actress she was a little cheerleader like any other girl. In middle georgia. Take your stupid a** theories somewhere else. I would honestly like to say this CHILD is far from a robot. Hollywood just wished they created her. Before she was an actress she was a little cheerleader like any other girl. In middle georgia. Take your stupid a** theories somewhere else.

]]> By: Sarah http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/#comment-25511 Sarah Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:25:07 +0000 http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/#comment-25511 I would honestly like to say this CHILD is far from a robot. Hollywood just wished they created her. Before she was an actress she was a little cheerleader like any other girl. In middle georgia. Take your stupid a** theories somewhere else. I would honestly like to say this CHILD is far from a robot. Hollywood just wished they created her. Before she was an actress she was a little cheerleader like any other girl. In middle georgia. Take your stupid a** theories somewhere else.

]]> By: Jaya http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/#comment-10051 Jaya Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:32:17 +0000 http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/#comment-10051 I don't know about Dakota Fanning, or these other child actors, but I am pretty darn sure that Bush is a robot. I saw one photo where you could see some sort of remote control wires coming off of him. I don’t know about Dakota Fanning,
or these other child actors, but
I am pretty darn sure that Bush
is a robot. I saw one photo where
you could see some sort of remote
control wires coming off of him.

]]> By: ImaginaryVisionary http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/#comment-19 ImaginaryVisionary Tue, 30 May 2006 02:21:02 +0000 http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/#comment-19 You left out a crucial step in the robot development process. Before scientists perfected the Dakota Fanning model they created the Olsen Twins. Dakota Fanning is a merging of both Olsen Twins minus the eating disorders and Bob Saget interference. Plus a sure sign that a child star robot is about to be outdated and put into "drug rehab" is when they get their likeness made into dolls. That way, even when they are out of work the robots still provide some source of finanacial gains for future generations of robot stars. You left out a crucial step in the robot development process. Before scientists perfected the Dakota Fanning model they created the Olsen Twins. Dakota Fanning is a merging of both Olsen Twins minus the eating disorders and Bob Saget interference.

Plus a sure sign that a child star robot is about to be outdated and put into “drug rehab” is when they get their likeness made into dolls. That way, even when they are out of work the robots still provide some source of finanacial gains for future generations of robot stars.

]]> By: tsarinaamanda http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/#comment-18 tsarinaamanda Sun, 09 Apr 2006 20:09:07 +0000 http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/#comment-18 That is the creepiest, ugliest child star EVER! hildren generally freak me out anyways, but this kid has that something extra that makes her uber-creepy. I wouldn't be surprised to find out that she is, in fact, a robot. Yuck. Creepy. It could only get worse if she announces that she's become a Scientologist. That is the creepiest, ugliest child star EVER! hildren generally freak me out anyways, but this kid has that something extra that makes her uber-creepy. I wouldn’t be surprised to find out that she is, in fact, a robot. Yuck. Creepy. It could only get worse if she announces that she’s become a Scientologist.

]]> By: Cat http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/#comment-17 Cat Fri, 10 Feb 2006 16:11:30 +0000 http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/#comment-17 Lovely post...I just stumbled upon your blog and just kept reading, reading...but had to post here. I think you're right! I would be careful though. If anyone in on this plan finds out you have figured things out, it might be dangerous for you. I'd watch myself in Toys 'R Us from now on, if I were you! *giggles* Lovely post…I just stumbled upon your blog and just kept reading, reading…but had to post here.

I think you’re right! I would be careful though. If anyone in on this plan finds out you have figured things out, it might be dangerous for you. I’d watch myself in Toys ‘R Us from now on, if I were you!

*giggles*

]]> By: dakota&ellefan http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/#comment-16 dakota&ellefan Wed, 08 Feb 2006 20:12:52 +0000 http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/#comment-16 While Dakota does have more total film and TV projects than most actors her age, she's not in more films this year. AnnaSophia Robb http://imdb.com/name/nm1455681 , Taylor Momsen http://imdb.com/name/nm0597410 , and Chloe Moretz http://imdb.com/name/nm1631269/ are all in as many or more films in 2006. While Dakota does have more total film and TV projects than most actors her age, she’s not in more films this year. AnnaSophia Robb http://imdb.com/name/nm1455681 , Taylor Momsen http://imdb.com/name/nm0597410 , and Chloe Moretz http://imdb.com/name/nm1631269/ are all in as many or more films in 2006.

]]> By: dakota&ellefan http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/#comment-15 dakota&ellefan Wed, 08 Feb 2006 20:12:24 +0000 http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/#comment-15 While Dakota does have more total film and TV projects than most actors her age, she's not in more films this year. AnnaSophia Robb http://imdb.com/name/nm1455681 , Taylor Momsen http://imdb.com/name/nm0597410 , and Chloe Moretz Chloe Moretz are all in as many or more films in 2006. While Dakota does have more total film and TV projects than most actors her age, she’s not in more films this year. AnnaSophia Robb http://imdb.com/name/nm1455681 , Taylor Momsen http://imdb.com/name/nm0597410 , and Chloe Moretz Chloe Moretz are all in as many or more films in 2006.

]]> By: Roxanne http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/#comment-14 Roxanne Wed, 08 Feb 2006 02:22:39 +0000 http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/#comment-14 I think she is a robot. It would explain why she is the ONLY child actor currently employed. Either that or she has a wicked agent! (My daughter's friend looked exactly like her when she was younger.) I think she is a robot. It would explain why she is the ONLY child actor currently employed. Either that or she has a wicked agent! (My daughter’s friend looked exactly like her when she was younger.)

]]>