Comments on: My theory on Dakota Fanning http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/ Once You Read It You Can't Unread It Fri, 25 Jun 2010 01:50:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: Tina http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/comment-page-1/#comment-39523 Tina Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:31:36 +0000 http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/#comment-39523 Dr. Peter Beter was talking about organic robotoids replacing politicians back in the '70's. See, for ex Dr. Peter David Beter - Audio Letter No. 47 June 28, 1979 http://www.peterdavidbeter.com/docs/all/dbal47.html Dr. Peter Beter was talking about organic robotoids replacing politicians back in the ’70’s. See, for ex

Dr. Peter David Beter – Audio Letter No. 47
June 28, 1979
http://www.peterdavidbeter.com/docs/all/dbal47.html

]]> By: XYZ http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/comment-page-1/#comment-39522 XYZ Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:24:44 +0000 http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/#comment-39522 No, Im not sayin ure crazy, not at all. Crazy and idiots are those who take for granted showbiz/Hollywood stuff. Sheeple, in short. Everything is possible, but I dont think FANNING or OSMENT are robots. Get a grip, really! They are mind controlled puppets, I agree, DNA altered, I agree, but not robots, at least not them. No, Im not sayin ure crazy, not at all. Crazy and idiots are those who take for granted showbiz/Hollywood stuff. Sheeple, in short. Everything is possible, but I dont think FANNING or OSMENT are robots. Get a grip, really! They are mind controlled puppets, I agree, DNA altered, I agree, but not robots, at least not them.

]]> By: u http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/comment-page-1/#comment-39516 u Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:17:23 +0000 http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/#comment-39516 Read Thanks for the Memories by Brice Taylor. It will change your views forever. Read Thanks for the Memories by Brice Taylor. It will change your views forever.

]]> By: Gardener http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/comment-page-1/#comment-32190 Gardener Sun, 01 Feb 2009 19:34:24 +0000 http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/#comment-32190 "Yuck. Creepy. It could only get worse if she announces that she’s become a Scientologist." Amen.. “Yuck. Creepy. It could only get worse if she announces that she’s become a Scientologist.”

Amen..

]]> By: Tily http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/comment-page-1/#comment-32027 Tily Sat, 31 Jan 2009 14:27:56 +0000 http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/#comment-32027 She is an amazing girl and actress, very talented, natural, complex. Lots of love. She is an amazing girl and actress, very talented, natural, complex. Lots of love.

]]> By: Carolyn http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/comment-page-1/#comment-25653 Carolyn Fri, 12 Sep 2008 19:54:27 +0000 http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/#comment-25653 *snort* Are you seriously offended or am I missing a joke? *snort*
Are you seriously offended or am I missing a joke?

]]> By: Sarah http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/comment-page-1/#comment-25510 Sarah Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:25:07 +0000 http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/#comment-25510 I would honestly like to say this CHILD is far from a robot. Hollywood just wished they created her. Before she was an actress she was a little cheerleader like any other girl. In middle georgia. Take your stupid a** theories somewhere else. I would honestly like to say this CHILD is far from a robot. Hollywood just wished they created her. Before she was an actress she was a little cheerleader like any other girl. In middle georgia. Take your stupid a** theories somewhere else.

]]> By: Sarah http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/comment-page-1/#comment-25511 Sarah Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:25:07 +0000 http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/#comment-25511 I would honestly like to say this CHILD is far from a robot. Hollywood just wished they created her. Before she was an actress she was a little cheerleader like any other girl. In middle georgia. Take your stupid a** theories somewhere else. I would honestly like to say this CHILD is far from a robot. Hollywood just wished they created her. Before she was an actress she was a little cheerleader like any other girl. In middle georgia. Take your stupid a** theories somewhere else.

]]> By: Jaya http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/comment-page-1/#comment-10051 Jaya Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:32:17 +0000 http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/#comment-10051 I don't know about Dakota Fanning, or these other child actors, but I am pretty darn sure that Bush is a robot. I saw one photo where you could see some sort of remote control wires coming off of him. I don’t know about Dakota Fanning,
or these other child actors, but
I am pretty darn sure that Bush
is a robot. I saw one photo where
you could see some sort of remote
control wires coming off of him.

]]> By: ImaginaryVisionary http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/comment-page-1/#comment-19 ImaginaryVisionary Tue, 30 May 2006 02:21:02 +0000 http://pointlessbanter.net/2006/02/07/my-theory-on-dakota-fanning/#comment-19 You left out a crucial step in the robot development process. Before scientists perfected the Dakota Fanning model they created the Olsen Twins. Dakota Fanning is a merging of both Olsen Twins minus the eating disorders and Bob Saget interference. Plus a sure sign that a child star robot is about to be outdated and put into "drug rehab" is when they get their likeness made into dolls. That way, even when they are out of work the robots still provide some source of finanacial gains for future generations of robot stars. You left out a crucial step in the robot development process. Before scientists perfected the Dakota Fanning model they created the Olsen Twins. Dakota Fanning is a merging of both Olsen Twins minus the eating disorders and Bob Saget interference.

Plus a sure sign that a child star robot is about to be outdated and put into “drug rehab” is when they get their likeness made into dolls. That way, even when they are out of work the robots still provide some source of finanacial gains for future generations of robot stars.

]]>