My theory on Dakota Fanning
My Theory on Dakota Fanning.
In a past blog I touched on the idea that I think Dakota Fanning was a robot produced by the Hollywood establishment in secret lab in Compton. I know it sounds completely insane, and totally nonsensical. But I firmly believe that she is not human. I know everyone is going to just laugh and say that I am being crazy. You might all have a picture in your head of me wearing tin foil on my head while writing this blog. However I think there is a lot of logic behind this. I am going to lay out my hypothesis below.
First let’s cover the background:
In the 80’s the Hollywood establishment was embarrassed by a rash of legal troubles that child stars ran into. Child stars while valuable, posed a lot of investment risks. They aged, they hit puberty, they had a restricted work rate, and they eventually would be used up by the Hollywood system which would come back and haunt them. Hollywood decided to use some of the top scientists in America to combat the problem. Their first breakthrough was in genetic research in what was labeled:
The Tuskegee Experiment Version 2.0.
TEV2.0 was an experiment with African American child actors. They were given genetically altered DNA that would keep the person looking young for numerous years, even far into adulthood. While there were many complications from the experiment resulting in numerous deaths of young African American actors, the studios believe that the ends justified the means. The end result gave us:

and

The experiment was considered initially to be a success. These actors could actually be older then the age they represented which helped out with their work rate because they didn’t have to follow child labor laws. Also since they were going to stay in this state for a longer period of time their “cuteness” factor increased, along with the show being able to be on for a longer period of time.
Eventually though people began to question why these kids never aged? Hollywood in order to protect their investment explained that they each had a special type of disease. Michael Jackson, who was sleeping with Emmanuel Lewis at the time, found out that he was actually 25 and not 9, was enraged. Jackson who was at the height of his fame and power back then organized a secret boycott of “Different Strokes” and “Webster” leading to both shows going off of the air.
The Hollywood big shots decided to go into phase two of their plan:
The Small Wonder Experiment
The small wonder experiment was a bold move by television executives and scientists. With advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) they executives believed that they could use a robot instead of actual child actors. The drawbacks were that their current model: the Tiffany Brissette series, had limited emotional range.

Eager to test out their new creation, the TV executives decided to craft a show about a girl that was a robot. By placing the robot in the show acting as girl acting as a robot and surrounding her with the worst possible actors ever assembled the executives figured nobody would catch on. The show went on for close to five years without anyone questioning the acting or the non-existent age change. After the show went off the ear the executives still wanted to see if they could get mileage out of their current model, so they placed her onto two television shows where her noticeable lack of personality would be ignored; “The 700 Club” and “Teen Win Lose or Draw”. Plus they figured nobody actually watched either of those shows.
The Hollywood executives were very eager to see the next phase of robotic child actors. However the technology available had limited them. The program became expensive and was shut down for a few years, child actors continued to work and things might have actually turned the corner until the Macualay Culkin breakdown.

After the arrest of Macualay Culkin Hollywood doubled their investment in the robotics program, leading to two new male models launched around the same time.
The Jonathan Lipnicki model:

and the Haley Joel Osment model:

These upgrades allowed them to come off a little more human. Also they could be brought back to the shop and slightly aged. Both series had some issues, the Lipnicki model was hampered by only being able to spit out two cute lines of dialogue at a time and nothing else. While the Haley Joel Osment model was uber creepy, and could only weird people out.
The current product: Dakota Fanning
Dakota Fanning or Small Wonder version 4.0 has been a huge success so far for the Hollywood executives. There are numerous improvements over the other models. One improvement being that she will randomly have a tooth fall out in order to provide that cute, awkward smile that everyone loves.

Plus even though she will have been in a ton of movies in a six year period it will always make her look like she is losing some of her front teeth, which increases the adorable factor.
Also new on the Dakota Fanning model is the fact that it can do two different modes.
Mode 1: The know it all, I am smarter then my age kid

Mode 2: Screaming freaked out little girl.

Why I know this is true:
I know right now people just got reading through the history of this Dakota Fanning Project and they all think this is far fetched. But now I am going to provide my evidence.
Her Teeth
For some reason Dakota Fanning always has teeth missing or they are just growing in. Yes I know she is like 12 but isn’t this about the time they are done falling out and she should be in braces or something? She continually has this tooth thing going on and it freaks me out. I don’t think this is even natural.
Her workload
www.IMDB.com has her listed in like 63 different projects and appearances since the year 202… This is a yeoman’s like effort. I know some people are saying so what… Let’s put her up against [tag]Jude Law[/tag] who as been in like every movie that came out in the last three years, I figure this will give us a good litmus test. He is slated at 47 movies and appearances since 2002.
Her intelligence
Dakota Fanning comes off way to well in interviews. She is like a 45 year old trapped in a 12 year olds body. Normal and above normal 12 year olds do not talk the way she does.
She is way too composed.
I think that I have laid out a compelling history and case of why Dakota Fanning is a robot?
Agree or disagree that she is, your thoughts?
















Many people have told me that my daughter looks a lot like Dakota Fanning. I wonder what I should take from this post…LOL. She does seem very poised and well spoken for a child her age. I think she’s in every movie that is released because there aren’t very many good female child actresses right now. I can’t think of another. They can’t be robots cause have you seen Haley Joel Osment lately? Adulthood does not look good on him. He’s not that cute anymore. If they were robots, they would stay young and cute forever. Interesting post.
I think she is a robot. It would explain why she is the ONLY child actor currently employed. Either that or she has a wicked agent! (My daughter’s friend looked exactly like her when she was younger.)
I would honestly like to say this CHILD is far from a robot. Hollywood just wished they created her. Before she was an actress she was a little cheerleader like any other girl. In middle georgia. Take your stupid a** theories somewhere else.
*snort*
Are you seriously offended or am I missing a joke?
I would honestly like to say this CHILD is far from a robot. Hollywood just wished they created her. Before she was an actress she was a little cheerleader like any other girl. In middle georgia. Take your stupid a** theories somewhere else.
While Dakota does have more total film and TV projects than most actors her age, she’s not in more films this year. AnnaSophia Robb http://imdb.com/name/nm1455681 , Taylor Momsen http://imdb.com/name/nm0597410 , and Chloe Moretz Chloe Moretz are all in as many or more films in 2006.
While Dakota does have more total film and TV projects than most actors her age, she’s not in more films this year. AnnaSophia Robb http://imdb.com/name/nm1455681 , Taylor Momsen http://imdb.com/name/nm0597410 , and Chloe Moretz http://imdb.com/name/nm1631269/ are all in as many or more films in 2006.
Lovely post…I just stumbled upon your blog and just kept reading, reading…but had to post here.
I think you’re right! I would be careful though. If anyone in on this plan finds out you have figured things out, it might be dangerous for you. I’d watch myself in Toys ‘R Us from now on, if I were you!
*giggles*
That is the creepiest, ugliest child star EVER! hildren generally freak me out anyways, but this kid has that something extra that makes her uber-creepy. I wouldn’t be surprised to find out that she is, in fact, a robot. Yuck. Creepy. It could only get worse if she announces that she’s become a Scientologist.
You left out a crucial step in the robot development process. Before scientists perfected the Dakota Fanning model they created the Olsen Twins. Dakota Fanning is a merging of both Olsen Twins minus the eating disorders and Bob Saget interference.
Plus a sure sign that a child star robot is about to be outdated and put into “drug rehab” is when they get their likeness made into dolls. That way, even when they are out of work the robots still provide some source of finanacial gains for future generations of robot stars.
I don’t know about Dakota Fanning,
or these other child actors, but
I am pretty darn sure that Bush
is a robot. I saw one photo where
you could see some sort of remote
control wires coming off of him.
She is an amazing girl and actress, very talented, natural, complex. Lots of love.
“Yuck. Creepy. It could only get worse if she announces that she’s become a Scientologist.”
Amen..
Read Thanks for the Memories by Brice Taylor. It will change your views forever.
No, Im not sayin ure crazy, not at all. Crazy and idiots are those who take for granted showbiz/Hollywood stuff. Sheeple, in short. Everything is possible, but I dont think FANNING or OSMENT are robots. Get a grip, really! They are mind controlled puppets, I agree, DNA altered, I agree, but not robots, at least not them.
Dr. Peter Beter was talking about organic robotoids replacing politicians back in the ’70’s. See, for ex
Dr. Peter David Beter – Audio Letter No. 47
June 28, 1979
http://www.peterdavidbeter.com/docs/all/dbal47.html